Counter argument to women preferring height over an athletic, muscular body.

Edit Post

Quote from: ReadRothbard on January 29, 2015, 09:15:00 PMThis is the way I think of it: say two men were to apply to a male stripping agency. One is a 6'2, 25% bodyfat, doesn't work out,  and the other guy is a ripped, good-looking 5'7 or 5'8 guy. Who do you think is going to make it? There is your answer.

this comparation is stupid, you put a guy who is not too short and ripped , with an obese tall guy

get in your mind that if you are really short being ripped or have a great physic doesnt matter.

a normal tall guy will allways be over you

Edit Post

Quote from: KirP1 on January 29, 2015, 09:22:01 PMthis comparation is stupid, you put a guy who is not too short and ripped , with an obese tall guy

get in your mind that if you are really short being ripped or have a great physic doesnt matter.

a normal tall guy will allways be over you

25% bodyfat isn't obese lol. Oh, and you're wrong; a 5'3 dude who is ripped is going to be infinitely better off than a 5'3 land whale.

Did you crawl out of a fking cave?

Edit Post

Quote from: ReadRothbard on January 29, 2015, 09:56:20 PM25% bodyfat isn't obese lol. Oh, and you're wrong; a 5'3 dude who is ripped is going to be infinitely better off than a 5'3 land whale.

Did you crawl out of a fking cave?

hahaha, what is your body fat? maybe you say that 25% body fat isnt obese because you are near that?

another stupid comparation. Compare a ripped 5´5 guy with a 6´0 normal man . who do you think womans will prefer?

Edit Post

Quote from: KirP1 on January 29, 2015, 10:08:04 PMhahaha, what is your body fat? maybe you say that 25% body fat isnt obese because you are near that?

another stupid comparation. Compare a ripped 5´5 guy with a 6´0 normal man . who do you think womans will prefer?

Dude, do you know about bodyfat standards? 25% bodyfat is on the edge of normal and overweight. Obese is 30%+ bodyfat.

It is going to depend on the 5'5 guy's facial aesthetics, his body language, etc.

Edit Post

I have 2 cousins, one is 6'1" 1/2 the other one is 6'3" and people prefer the shorter and muscular one but that's only because they are both giants relative to the rest of the cousins but I am sure that pseudo-midgets of 5'6" won't rip as much benefits from musculature.

Edit Post

Quote from: Puertoricanwasp123 on January 30, 2015, 01:33:36 AMI have 2 cousins, one is 6'1" 1/2 the other one is 6'3" and people prefer the shorter and muscular one but that's only because they are both giants relative to the rest of the cousins but I am sure that pseudo-midgets of 5'6" won't rip as much benefits from musculature.

http://www.blogto.com/film/2012/06/confessions_of_a_male_stripper_in_toronto/

Edit Post

Quote from: ReadRothbard on January 30, 2015, 01:41:19 AMhttp://www.blogto.com/film/2012/06/confessions_of_a_male_stripper_in_toronto/

Interesting article.

Edit Post

Being tall is effortless. Working out is not. Nuff said

Edit Post

Quote from: rodocat on February 01, 2015, 01:31:14 AMBeing tall is effortless. Working out is not. Nuff said

If somebody could explain that to women in a way they can understand that would be great.

Edit Post

Quote from: Puertoricanwasp123 on February 01, 2015, 09:18:36 PMIf somebody could explain that to women in a way they can understand that would be great.

Women like short-to-average height buff guys better than your average flabby tall guy.