Hi Ozymandias!
Quote from: Ozymandias on November 30, 2015, 11:19:42 PMInteresting. When you say that femurs heal faster than tibiae, do you mean lengthening speed?
I mean that, all things being equal, femurs will take less time, compared to tibiae, to recuperate to the same level as the other....
I distracted both segments at the same speed, by the way. Don't know if that helps you or not.
Quote from: Ozymandias on November 30, 2015, 11:19:42 PMOr do you feel that -overall- the leg with the broken femur is recovering better (less pain, better flexibility, etc) that the other one?
I mean this as well. All things considered, my femur is recovering better than tibia.
When considering recovery time and complications, femur segment is a better LL candidate than tibia. I'm pretty sure medical professionals globally are unanimous in that opinion. Feel free to let me know if I'm wrong.
Quote from: Ozymandias on November 30, 2015, 11:19:42 PMPersonally, I am still deciding between tibia and femur, so any info on this will be really useful!
Unless you have a very specific reason to do tibia, I would suggest femurs without a doubt. As I've stated in some earlier posts, the benefits of recovery time, relative safety, and options far outweigh any proportion or cost concerns in my opinion. I've done both femur and tibia at the same time, and can assure you that they're both very different animals.. It's not like choosing "chicken or fish" on your airline meal 
Hope that helps!