I can't help but to notice that (almost) everybody here is stopping at 6 centimetres in the tibia and 6.7-7.0 centimetres in the femur.
Everybody (males and females) seem to be making it 6 centimetres, but so many don't seem to be making it 7-8 centimetres. I don't think this is a coincidence. What do you guys think? Is it just me?
I have also chosen my Doctor for Limb Lengthening in May of this year. I wont reveal who as of yet, but let's just say he is a really safe and caring Doctor. My current ratio is 1.29 and my tibia length is 37 centimetres and my femur length is 48 centimetres. I plan to do 5.5 centimetres in the tibia which means I will be lengthening 15% of my original bone length. And my ratio will be 1.12. Should I risk and do 6 centimetres and go a bit over 15% of the original bone length?
Imagine if I did 20% of my original bone length in my femurs. I would be able to get 9.6 centimetres out of it!
What do you all think? Sound like an okay plan?
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
I have seen a huge pattern here at the Limb Lengthening Forum!
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Jan 8, 2016, 4:41 pm
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Can Limb Lengthening Help Teens Grow 5cm Taller at 13 Years Old Safely
nina_r95
7 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening in Turkey costs how much per cm with newest Precice nail techniques
HeightHunter22
8 replies • 1 month ago
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 2 months ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 2 months ago