Quote from: Max on May 09, 2016, 10:44:46 PMI know for a fact that if I was a little like 3 inch taller i would have had the girl I "loved" more than myself but no I can't there is nothing wrong in her as a matter of fact height discrimination should not be blamed on the people who do it because when we say the are shallow we forget that we ourselves are choosy . I mean thats our instinct we go for the better looking . You tell me you have two girls equally good one is bald and other is completely perfect whom will you go for ? remember both are exactly same .
Completely disagree with you here. Preferences are one thing, and if a woman wants a partner that is at least this tall, and is honest and straight about it, without acting disrespectul towards a suitor she rejects, there's nothing wrong about it. Height discrimination on the other hand is wrong and should the pointed out, questioned and criticized openly. It's one thing if a woman thinks "I would love a guy to be 1,85 like Channing Tatum, but if he's really cute and confident (or something like that), anything could happen even if he's shorter", or if she thinks "Short men are beneath me because they're not real men and I'm too sexy for them", the second position should be shamed and criticized.
If a girl didn't accept you because of your height, she wasn't the right for you, simple as that, and you should seriously question your love to her, she's just human like everyone else, she farts, she takes stinking dumps and she is often selfish and immature like all of us are at times. Of course everyone has preferences when looking for partners, and that's nothing to be ashamed about, the question lies in the detail - are these preferences reasonable or not? Are the preferences of 160 cm girl who wants at least a 185 guy reasonable?
Taller doesn't necessarily mean "better looking", and it's pretty useless to imagine two exactly equal women, one being bald and the other one being perfect. People aren't equal no matter how you put it.