My sitting height is 35.4 inches, I'm 5'7.5, and my inseam ranges from 31 to 32 depending on how I measure it. I take a book and shove it between my legs so it is touching the pubic bone, and if I do this hard enough then I have measured an inseam of 32 inches. I feel like this dosen't make sense compared to my 35.5 inch sitting height and how I am wearing 30X30 pants (athletic fit). I have thickish-thighs I weigh 150 and squat and lift so I don't know if that could boost my sitting height. Anyways I just want to know because I plan on lengthening 2 inches in my femurs, less if I go past a .49 inseam to height ratio.
← Back to Height & Proportions
Whats more accurate, sitting height or inseam?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Mar 13, 2019, 9:37 pm
#1
Posted on Apr 17, 2019, 10:14 am
#2
I immediately read the content of this website when I became a member of this website. Which I was very impressed.
Posted on Apr 17, 2019, 11:25 am
#3
Your inseam is more accurate as it is 100% based on your height.
Your sitting height can vary a good 10cm or more depending on your weight
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Femur lengthening procedure results: Can 8cm gains be achieved with newest internal nails safely
grace_p94
7 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening for teenage girls: Can 16-year-old girls gain 5cm safely with modern techniques
cole_w92
7 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening in Turkey: Is 4000 dollars a realistic surgery cost for 5cm height gain
mike_r
7 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening doctor in India: Is Delhi a safer option than Mumbai for 6cm height gains
daniel2002
7 replies • 1 month ago
Femur lengthening before and after results: How precise is 7cm gain with newest internal nail systems
chloe_j
5 replies • 1 month ago
Can Limb Lengthening at 16 Add 2 Inches Permanently and Safely
sophia_lee
8 replies • 2 months ago