I have e-mailed Dr. Giotikas this study: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26398436
This is his/his assistant's answer:
Thank you for the link you shared, very interesting study with a large sample. Only caveat is that it is cadaveric (dead bones) study so it bases the diagnosis of arthritis on the condition of the joint only and not on actual symptoms of arthritis (pain, joint stiffness, disability etc). Osteoarthritis is mainly a clinical diagnosis and we have seen great variability between the condition of the joint and the severity of symptoms. Treatment decisions on osteoarthritis are based mainly on the symptoms and signs of clinical examination of the patient rather than on x-rays showing just the condition of the joint. In any case, the preoperative planning of your case includes the respect of your body proportions and this is the great value of "Athena" method.
What do you think about it? I haven't understand everything.
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
0.8 ratio - arthritis risk - Dr. Giotikas' opinion
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Jul 16, 2018, 9:56 am
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago