MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 10:20 am
#1
Hi everyone. I have been lurking on this forum for some time now and now I guess it's time I start my journey. But for that I need advice from the many users here especially the ones who have undergone this surgery. I may not know everything which is why I'm seeking advice but I am fully convinced that this surgery will bring great benefit to me

So I'm about 168 cm although that's average it's not tall enough for modelling. I have many guys saying I have a 9/10 face and that I should be a model but unfortunately I just don't cut it in terms of height. Female models here only have a chance if they're 5' 7 or above.

So my plan is to add about 5 cm. Because I may need to reveal under the knee in photo shoots and my upper leg is quite stubby and looks shorter I want to lengthen my upper leg bone. I think doing femurs externally is a great idea because it's the cheaper option but I don't know for sure and would welcome feedback

I can't wait to hear from you guys!
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 10:56 am
#2
You want to do modelling after external femur LL lol.
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 12:06 pm
#3
Quote from: YourSpaceBoyfriend on August 01, 2017, 10:56:58 AMYou want to do modelling after external femur LL lol.


why she couldn't ? stop thinking you will look like Manute Bol with LL
but you should not, in truth 168 cm is already above female average (where you from ?)
And there is already many 5'6 models, even some famous ones. You are rating yourself 9/10, if it's the case 5cm won't change anything, I promise it.

Except that, internal could be a better choice for femur. 5cm is good. If you make it, good luck.


Like (0)
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 12:51 pm
#4
Quote from: theophilo on August 01, 2017, 12:06:30 PM
why she couldn't ? stop thinking you will look like Manute Bol with LL
but you should not, in truth 168 cm is already above female average (where you from ?)
And there is already many 5'6 models, even some famous ones. You are rating yourself 9/10, if it's the case 5cm won't change anything, I promise it.

Except that, internal could be a better choice for femur. 5cm is good. If you make it, good luck.
Only from the scars external femur has she couldn't.
Furthermore, proportions for a model is the most important thing and 5 cm in femurs would make her legs seem weird. Women imo should do tibias only, long femurs for a woman is unaesthetic.
And finally, whoever does LL to become a model is moron imo because there would be, even a small, gait disturbance and a disproportion in legs which are enough to not be able to become a successful model.

So if you have a 9/10 face and with a 1.68 height you can become a glamour model.
Forget LL and catwalks.
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 12:53 pm
#5
Quote from: theophilo on August 01, 2017, 12:06:30 PM
why she couldn't ? stop thinking you will look like Manute Bol with LL
but you should not, in truth 168 cm is already above female average (where you from ?)
And there is already many 5'6 models, even some famous ones. You are rating yourself 9/10, if it's the case 5cm won't change anything, I promise it.

Except that, internal could be a better choice for femur. 5cm is good. If you make it, good luck.

Oh lol Ill give you a hint he was the atagonist in the lion king.
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 1:07 pm
#6
Quote from: Body Builder on August 01, 2017, 12:51:56 PMOnly from the scars external femur has she couldn't.
Furthermore, proportions for a model is the most important thing and 5 cm in femurs would make her legs seem weird. Women imo should do tibias only, long femurs for a woman is unaesthetic.
And finally, whoever does LL to become a model is moron imo because there would be, even a small, gait disturbance and a disproportion in legs which are enough to not be able to become a successful model.

So if you have a 9/10 face and with a 1.68 height you can become a glamour model.
Forget LL and catwalks.

longer femur are always weird
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 1:14 pm
#7
i thought tall girls usually have longer femurs


look at Hannah Stocking(177cm) for example, her femurs look quite long and she looks amazing
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 1:28 pm
#8
Quote from: tallertree on August 01, 2017, 01:14:09 PMi thought tall girls usually have longer femurs


look at Hannah Stocking(177cm) for example, her femurs look quite long and she looks amazing

Hannah Stocking don't really have long legs for her height if she is a honest 177
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 1:40 pm
#9
maybe not but i think her femurs are quite long compared to her tibias and i think this is quite usual for females when i look at pictures of tall female friends i have
Like (0)
Posted on Aug 5, 2017, 12:50 am
#10
Im from Sweden. I think the average for girls my age are 170 cm. I wouldn't consider myself significantly short, but not tall either. Do men find longer tibias or longer femurs to be more attractive? I think we can agree at least that longer legs are nicer though
Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics