wana see different opinions on external tibias. only external tibias with fixators and no nailing. its advantages and possible disadvantages.
could it be the least invasive and safest surgery to recover from
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Sep 9, 2018, 4:02 pm
#1
Posted on Sep 12, 2018, 7:09 am
#2
Biggest advantage - no messing with the bone canal or risk of permanent knee pain related to pushing the metal rod into the tibia through the open knee cap.
Biggest disadvantage - can take a year or even longer if you're unlucky until it is safe to remove the frames.
Posted on Sep 12, 2018, 5:50 pm
#3
Quote from: Kotiki on September 12, 2018, 07:09:02 AMBiggest advantage - no messing with the bone canal or risk of permanent knee pain related to pushing the metal rod into the tibia through the open knee cap.
Biggest disadvantage - can take a year or even longer if you're unlucky until it is safe to remove the frames.
yup knew that. u just reconfirmed it. hopefully for me it takes half that time. atleast i hope so if my diet is good.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago