wana see different opinions on external tibias. only external tibias with fixators and no nailing. its advantages and possible disadvantages.
could it be the least invasive and safest surgery to recover from
Posted on Sep 9, 2018, 4:02 pm
#1
Posted on Sep 12, 2018, 7:09 am
#2
Biggest advantage - no messing with the bone canal or risk of permanent knee pain related to pushing the metal rod into the tibia through the open knee cap.
Biggest disadvantage - can take a year or even longer if you're unlucky until it is safe to remove the frames.
Posted on Sep 12, 2018, 5:50 pm
#3
Quote from: Kotiki on September 12, 2018, 07:09:02 AMBiggest advantage - no messing with the bone canal or risk of permanent knee pain related to pushing the metal rod into the tibia through the open knee cap.
Biggest disadvantage - can take a year or even longer if you're unlucky until it is safe to remove the frames.
yup knew that. u just reconfirmed it. hopefully for me it takes half that time. atleast i hope so if my diet is good.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Ultimate Guide to Precice Stryde
CuriousPatient
2 replies • 4 hours ago
An australian guy grew 6 inches at 26 years old while in a 3 months coma
sxxa
55 replies • 3 days ago
VIOLENCE in yonsei kim & chung orthopedic clinic
shi
240 replies • 4 days ago
Fitbone nail sound once it reaches its maximum length?
KevinnLord
2 replies • 6 days ago
PlANNING TO DO ANOTHER SURGERY IN VIETNAM IN 2026 ANYONE WANTS TO JOIN ME?
NorthBarista
17 replies • 1 week ago