MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Nov 29, 2016, 4:18 am
#1

I would like to know if is completely silly going for 7 cm or can be an option.Please feel free to give you opinion.

Like (0)
Posted on Nov 29, 2016, 9:45 pm
#2

Hybrid External Fixator seems to be working great even with great amounts of lengthening.Notootall in the old forum got 8 cm and is  fine, Lumiere here got 7 cm and is fine, so I dont understand.

Like (0)
Posted on Nov 29, 2016, 11:32 pm
#3

I dont know if going for 7 cm or 6 cm, I dont do sports but I dont want to walk like a 60 years old person.

Like (0)
Posted on Nov 30, 2016, 5:28 am
#4

Ok, so 6 cm is fine I think.

Like (0)
Posted on Dec 1, 2016, 2:09 am
#5

Yes, Iamready, I would go for 4 cm in  tibias. The problems is that second surgery will have to wait a lot, so I want at least 6 cm to tart with. I would love being 6 2", however would be 12 cm and is quite a lot. I would lengthen my arms 4 cm too, maybe doing two surgeries with a great distance of time could allow me go for 12 cm or 11 cm.

Like (0)
Posted on Dec 1, 2016, 3:59 am
#6

16 years, If I would want femurs I would do my fisrt operation in 2023, tibias in 2021, 2 years is a lot of wait. My second operation in 2028, and arm lengthening in 2029, I will follow the steps of Iamready with 3 surgeries.

Like (0)
Posted on Dec 4, 2016, 2:59 am
#7

Yes, but I cant afford internal methods at least for 7 years, that is a lot of time. 5-6 is reasonable for this segment.

Like (0)
Posted on Dec 4, 2016, 2:59 am
#8

Yes, but I cant afford internal methods at least for 7 years, that is a lot of time. 5-6 is reasonable for this segment.

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics