I'm trying to figure out if people experiences issues by not removing the nail.
It's 10k-15k to remove it, so I'm trying to figure out if that can be put off until later if need be rather than factored into the initial cost to save up.
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
Did not removing the rod later cause you problems?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Oct 13, 2019, 9:03 pm
#1
Posted on Oct 14, 2019, 3:23 am
#2
Well if you're into anything high impact I'd get them removed. I like to snowboard, and one thing I wouldn't want are rods in my canals vibrating against my bones during landings.
Posted on Oct 14, 2019, 5:35 am
#3
Are you planning one more LL Kilokahn?
Posted on Oct 14, 2019, 12:06 pm
#4
Quote from: KiloKAHN on October 14, 2019, 03:23:40 AMWell if you're into anything high impact I'd get them removed. I like to snowboard, and one thing I wouldn't want are rods in my canals vibrating against my bones during landings.
Are you considering concealing tattoos for the scars?
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 4 weeks ago