What do yall think of the fact that ur hands, feet, fingers and toes, arms, torso, neck (and maybe dck too) will always be small for ur height if u do LL and u will never actually have a "tall" frame even if u do actually become tall. Being tall is about having a certain frame not just having long legs. I just can't get over the fact the I will never have a tall frame.
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Aug 13, 2023, 8:03 pm
#1
Posted on Aug 13, 2023, 8:04 pm
#2
It can be somewhat fixed by going to the gym. Working out the shoulders can give an illusion of wider frame.
Posted on Aug 13, 2023, 8:31 pm
#3
It's a disadvantage, no two ways about it. It's still better to be tall with a 'bad frame' than short with a 'proportional' (but still objectively bad in raw numbers) frame, though.
Although I suspect this is a troll post since height and dck size are in no way correlated, and you probably know that.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago