Like the question says lol just a curious question to actually see if anyone actually knows how much ll has changed since it became more popular I.e. would it be more beneficial to do LL now or is it basically the same as then.
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
How much has the technology for LL changed in the last 10-15 years
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Nov 8, 2018, 1:41 am
#1
Posted on Nov 8, 2018, 2:58 am
#2
Quote from: Body Builder on November 08, 2018, 02:15:01 AMStryde changed everything.
A fully weight bearing magnetic internal nail is simply the most revolutionary and easy way to do LL.
So yes, the technology changed a lot. But not the last 10 years. The last few months!
Has it only been a few months since it’s been out honestly didn’t expect that.
Posted on Nov 8, 2018, 10:08 am
#3
Quote from: Realistic on November 08, 2018, 06:16:59 AMYes..Stryde is great in that recovery process is much better..But the question is are there methodologies that have been developed to prevent any risks/complications or does it remain the same?
That’s what I wanted to say so but didn’t know how to word it so thanks 😂😂
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 4 weeks ago