Dear all,
I don't want to spam the forum with repetitive posts (reference to my earlier posts), but I just learnt about STRYDE's arrival to the market (for now with Paley and, hopefully WW in 2019) and in this light i am trying to gather more perspective here.
Why tibia? i have already long femurs - super long for my body
why STRYDE - cause having this surgery in my 30th in the US and not in my 20th somewhere in Russia (i am Russian, would be theoretically a little easier task than for some LLers) with STRYDE makes me feel less guilty for not doing LL earlier.
a question - I am a female and skinny and small-boned, so you know the odds are against me proceeding with internal tibias -BUT - can a STRYDE nail diameter be small enough to do this procedure internally on tibias for a petite female?
PS: f...k me for not doing this with Solomin 10 years ago!
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
internal tibia for a female - not a possibility - even with STRYDE?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Jun 20, 2018, 5:35 am
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago