I'm a guy who generally plays it "safe". I know LL isn't fully safe and if I was truly a safe guy I would stay far away from this, but my hatred of my height outweighs my fears. It seems no doctor truly endorses going past three inches/7 centimeters. So at 5'5" would getting the extra two inches be a good amount or would it be pointless? I figure with shoes+lifts I could be 5'9 and that is about average. Also would femur be a "safer" bet or tibia?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Mar 24, 2017, 2:01 am
#1
Posted on Mar 24, 2017, 3:04 am
#2
definitely safer to do femurs... i think doing 2 inches would probably be worth it, 2.5 definitely worth it. everyone has their own (likely egocentric) bent toward what heights have the most to gain from the surgery, but I personally think 2-2.5 inches for anyone 5'4-5'6 would likely make a huge difference. Definitely doesn't get you to average male height but gets you above average female which may mean something to you or others.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Can Limb Lengthening Help Teens Grow 5cm Taller at 13 Years Old Safely
nina_r95
7 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening in Turkey costs how much per cm with newest Precice nail techniques
HeightHunter22
8 replies • 1 month ago
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 2 months ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 2 months ago