Hello folks,
I think people should not do 7cm's on femurs if they have short tibias.
And when I look at the mirror (a body mirror), even though there is a possibility of my tibias being longer than average(bcs I never got an xray) , I still think they are short as f**. And they are probably either short or average.
If I get money in the future, I'd love to add 7cm on femurs and 5 cm on tibias which are pretty decent for safety I guess.
But I think, even If everything went good; I probably could be %80 as I used to be at the best.I think having 2 surgeries is way too dangerous than we think. I might not even get back to my %80. Maybe %70.
What do you guys think about that?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Jul 18, 2020, 4:59 pm
#1
Posted on Jul 18, 2020, 6:02 pm
#2
Agreed. But I still have concerns about my agility. I think like if I had 2 surgeries, i'd fk myself up.
Posted on Jul 19, 2020, 1:08 am
#3
Any comments?
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Limb lengthening in Turkey costs how much per cm with newest Precice nail techniques
HeightHunter22
8 replies • 2 hours ago
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago