I have some concerns about whether the tissue created via distraction histogenesis is in some way inferior to that which exists pre-op. In other words, is the muscular tissue that grows to fill in the distracted gap in your tissues worse than you normal muscle tissue, or is it the same?
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
Is muscular, connective, and nervous tissue grown via leg lengthening worse?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Jan 25, 2022, 10:53 pm
#1
Posted on Jan 25, 2022, 11:49 pm
#2
Quote from: SuchLL on January 25, 2022, 11:44:57 PMI know the bones growing to fill in the gap are thicker thus stronger. Not sure about muscles… it’s probably hard to know
I'll probably just have to head to google scholar and read studies on the topic.
Posted on Jan 26, 2022, 1:50 am
#3
Quote from: AimHigh on January 26, 2022, 01:24:22 AMBoth my knees are tight and creaky, and TFLs are very tight. I do 100 body weight squats per day it takes 25 before my knees loosen up and max 140 beg flexion, this is ~ 4 years after CLL femoral 8cm (retrograde insertion).....
That's insane, although I know femoral lengthening is going to make the biomechanics of squats different.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago