I think you guys got it all wrong. If Paley himself states this is his best method for maximum gain and optimal safety, whats the downside with this? Maybe its breaking the bones twice instead of once? I imagine that wouldnt really affect you all that much in a negative light because the bone will still be just as strong the second time around it fills in and heals up. Getting a quick 8cm 4+4 fibs plus tibs with stryde, you will most likely heal up super fast and be walking by like the 3rd month and then rebreaking the bones lets say up to a year later, or perhaps just 6 months later for another 4+4, you're a whole 16cm taller in less than 2 years max. I honestly think this method is slept on heavy and when i do get the surgery with Paley ill prove its the best method for this. It just makes everything seem so easy and safe even though the cost is very high its worth it
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
Is this the best LL method? As far as having a quick, comfortably safe recovery?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Oct 26, 2018, 6:14 pm
#11
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 4 weeks ago