i see, reading diaries, majority of people prefer doing LON instead of pure externals.
so what the point to do LON? only in time economy to wear ext fixators?
and what about risks? - bone misalignment, higher risk of infection, etc
or they are all negligible so the LON becomes the best option?
P.S. i wanted to do pure externals, but now i am doubt maybe to choose LON.
Posted on Jun 18, 2021, 12:01 pm
#1
Posted on Jun 19, 2021, 1:25 pm
#2
Quote from: Medium Drink Of Water on June 18, 2021, 07:30:12 PMThe only advantage of LON is that you don't have to wear the fixators as long. If you have time, do pure externals.
yeah, but what about disadvatages, if they are just slightly higher, so maybe its better to choose LON?
i try to understand logic , why a lot of people choose LON instead pure ext, or there is only one reason - time economy?
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Limb lengthening cost in Vietnam vs other countries which is the cheapest option for a 5cm length gain
ExpertLimb631
7 replies • 5 hours ago
Ultimate Guide to how to grow taller naturally and permanently
scanGuru
8 replies • 6 hours ago
Ultimate Guide to Precice Stryde
SeekerFan138
2 replies • 1 day ago
Is forearm lengthening safe?
Curious597
3 replies • 1 day ago
An australian guy grew 6 inches at 26 years old while in a 3 months coma
sxxa
55 replies • 1 day ago