i see, reading diaries, majority of people prefer doing LON instead of pure externals.
so what the point to do LON? only in time economy to wear ext fixators?
and what about risks? - bone misalignment, higher risk of infection, etc
or they are all negligible so the LON becomes the best option?
P.S. i wanted to do pure externals, but now i am doubt maybe to choose LON.
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Jun 18, 2021, 12:01 pm
#1
Posted on Jun 19, 2021, 1:25 pm
#2
Quote from: Medium Drink Of Water on June 18, 2021, 07:30:12 PMThe only advantage of LON is that you don't have to wear the fixators as long. If you have time, do pure externals.
yeah, but what about disadvatages, if they are just slightly higher, so maybe its better to choose LON?
i try to understand logic , why a lot of people choose LON instead pure ext, or there is only one reason - time economy?
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Limb lengthening in Turkey costs how much per cm with newest Precice nail techniques
HeightHunter22
8 replies • 4 hours ago
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago