MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Jan 10, 2017, 9:33 pm
#11

Quote from: KiloKAHN on January 10, 2017, 09:24:01 PMWell if it's femur lengthening with LON, then it makes sense to do fewer CM. The muscles around the femur are very strong and the monorail can only tolerate the muscle resistance up to a point. Beyond that the chance of misalignment problems increases a great deal because it can't handle all that tension. This is in addition to the scarring that causes reduction of knee ROM. My doc said he wouldn't do more than 3 or 4 cm with femur LON for CLL because of these reasons.


For tibia is it better to do hybrid ext. fixator or LON? Are the benefits of LON over external fixator worth the increased chance of perm knee pain? Is the hybrid over pure external different significantly or only marginally?

Like (0)
Posted on Jan 11, 2017, 9:30 am
#12

dr.ju hwan chung said that he recommend me to lengthenening more tibia than femur because, femur is stronger than tibia,because of this lengthening more on tibia will make muscle more and stronger as body function to protect themself.

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics