I had this thought like they can either (obviously) just not do this surgery and enjoy their already great height
Maybe an exception would be places where people are very tall/his friends are very tall and then 5'10 would feel like an effective 5'8 to them
Or they could just do 5cm internal femurs with a weight bearing nail that can support their (sometimes) greater weight and get 6+ feet --and be walking in noticeably less time compared to people doing like 7-8 cm
And then just 5cm compared to their already long legs would not be that noticeable proportionally/leg proportions would still look good. So I wonder if in a weird way if doctors would see a 5'10 + patient as a great candidate (them not having to do as much length to achieve a great final result seems like a significant advantage). Then again, there was that already tall Polish basketball player Dr. Betz talked about in the youtube interview who did 13cm on femurs and the doc felt it was crazy
Though realistically, I guess if a 5'10 + person does LL he probably is going to do more than 5 cm because he has that kind of personality to want to improve on something that is already pretty good
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Nov 28, 2022, 4:18 pm
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago