Hey 
i have been reading a lot in here about the big chances of complications and im aware of them now thanks to this wonderful forum. now im not a top specialist in human psychology but wouldent it be logical to Think that people with minor complecation is more likely to seek support in great groups like this compered to the almost 100 % outcoms who reather just move away from the computer . all the great outcomes in here seems to make one good update and Then moves on . what do you think ? I would love to know the "Real statistics"
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Feb 4, 2017, 10:42 am
#1
Posted on Feb 4, 2017, 3:52 pm
#2
The closest thing to "real statistics" you can find are the published scientific studies about limb lengthening, which include the % of patients with minor or major complications. You can read a lot of them (if you haven't already done so) at sites like www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.
Just be careful because most of them are focused on kids with dwarfism or people with leg discrepancy, so look for those focusing on "cosmetic" limb lengthening.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago