Hey
Im currently at consolidation phase but dealing with 2 infected pin sites.
The surgeon is considering taking them out and replace them with new ones. I prefer just taking them out.
The surgeon says its not wise and may cause instability of the frame.
But I already did a second surgery to replace two pins, and one of the new ones got infected now. So I feel really bad keep drilling holes in my leg.
In other places I see the monolateral fixator and it seems they have considerably less pin sites than mine. I currently have 6 large pins and 2 kwire smaller pins.
The question is - if tibia can be stabled with 3-4 pins, perhaps I can manage with only removing a pin or two, without putting new ones instead.
One of the infected pin the uppermost site in the medial knee, and it's infected so bad and really painful. I'm really discouraged of putting a new pin in this sensitive area..
Anyone got a clue from his experience?
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
Question for tibia lengtheners with external frame
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Jul 22, 2023, 1:43 pm
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago