Will see nearer the time, but I would make completely sure I have enough for leg lengthening and humerus lengthening, my arms would look comically short without it, but yeah in all likely hood I probably will go with leg lengthening first.
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Apr 8, 2019, 11:09 pm
#11
Posted on Apr 10, 2019, 9:35 pm
#12
yes do the legs 1st if ur short. ppl don generally notice arm size relative to body size. wat is noticed is the overall frame size which will be uplifted with legs. u can bulk up arms and if u decide do it later. It shouldnt be ur primary concern unless uve got 4 inch humerus.
Posted on Apr 10, 2019, 10:14 pm
#13
https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/10/28/men-slightly-longer-legs-are-more-attractive-women-12044
I haven't found the full article jet but in this there is a passage which says that arm length doesn't bother.
Posted on Apr 10, 2019, 11:21 pm
#14
Thats weird. My inseam is 32, and I'm 5'7.5. I have a long (5'11) wingspan though.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Can Limb Lengthening Help Teens Grow 5cm Taller at 13 Years Old Safely
nina_r95
7 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening in Turkey costs how much per cm with newest Precice nail techniques
HeightHunter22
8 replies • 1 month ago
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 2 months ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 2 months ago