Searched around and read alrund the forums and been reading mixed results (probably with a mix of older articles and new articles)
Assuming you do a "safe amount " (so nothing ridiculous like 10cm+) and you heal normally along with rehab going well, do you really lose much functionality at all?
Also i don't even understand why LL (other than the painful procedure and maybe recovery time) would cause people to have problems with athletic functions. Athletic people have to adapt to more difficult tasks as they progress, so wouldn't a increase in leg length just be another task to adapt to? As we grew up as kids we also had to adapt to our changing bodies and I don't necessarily recall any moments where I thought "Oh golly gee my legs are much too long/too short for me right now". Maybe with an increase of 8cm and at an older age it might take longer to adapt/feel comfortable, but even then isn't that what rehab helps with?
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
So overall how much functionality do you really lose/retain after LL?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Dec 6, 2018, 4:08 am
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago