Quote from: LittleWhiteMan on May 12, 2018, 11:02:26 PMI won’t do LL. Simply too risky and expensive, and still doesn’t guarantee anything. And will fk up my proportions regardless.
If you dont do LL then at 5.1 nothing can help you, even if you had the frame of a bber.
So dont bother finding a solution, your problem cant be fixed otherwise, thats the harsh reality.
Only stem cell technology can be used for proportional growth I believe, I too don't want my legs broken and go through a painful experience while staying in bed for years 
. The shorter you are the more adverse the effects, like narrow frame with a bobble head which overall makes you look like a kid. The guys that are 5'7"-5'11" can assuredly do CLL to whatever heights they desire while the <5'7" has a pestilent limitation that can't be circumvented 
. Hopefully it comes in less than 10 years, fingers crossed 
.
I'm 5'4", visited Mexico recently, felt average. Taller guys weren't that much taller. It's like everyone shrank, was interesting since I was in San Diego just an hour earlier.
I'd say get CLL. I'm 5'4" (85 cm sitting height btw) and want more, but honestly it's not too bad. I'm the shortest guy in most occasions, but I'm still taller than many women, and that's if I'm in the US. Well, I'm wearing lifts too though...
And yeah, I am frequently told that I look young. But I haven't been carded a few times, so there's that.
Edit: Did not wear lifts while in Mexico (Tijuana).
I am 5'5" and while living in a sxitty third world country feel emasculated most of the time. Always self conscious about my stature and neotony that I can't even smoke in tranquility, all those eyes piercing towards me. People trying to infer whether they should confront me or not about being under age, It isn't pleasant and going to the bar alone is daunting. I can't even fathom what It must be like for OP but I understand partially, I think CLL isn't the answer for us short guys that look stunted and underdeveloped. We need some thing better to fix "all" of our problems and until then we should consider CLL as an inferior alternative rather than an absolute.
Quote from: Android on May 13, 2018, 08:30:32 PMI'm 5'4", visited Mexico recently, felt average. Taller guys weren't that much taller. It's like everyone shrank, was interesting since I was in San Diego just an hour earlier.
I'd say get CLL. I'm 5'4" (85 cm sitting height btw) and want more, but honestly it's not too bad. I'm the shortest guy in most occasions, but I'm still taller than many women, and that's if I'm in the US. Well, I'm wearing lifts too though...
And yeah, I am frequently told that I look young. But I haven't been carded a few times, so there's that.
Visit Guatemala next for a taste of the ancient Mayan civilization and wear your lifts so you feel tall too. Maybe revisit it later, after CLL, to feel like you are a professional NBA player.
Quote The shortest women were born in 1896 in Guatemala, and were on average 140 cm tall.
Quote Women born in 1996 are shortest in Guatemala, with an average height of 149.4 cm (148.0–150.7), and are shorter than 151 cm in Bangladesh and Nepal.
A century later and they're still the shortest.
Or get a motorcycle. Some chicks dig it.
Quote from: myloginacct on May 13, 2018, 10:40:49 AMAlso, if you speak Spanish, you could consider moving further down to southern Mexico, Guatemala or Bolivia, where people are much shorter, and the women average height is shorter or equal than yours.
They are not short anymore. At least the youth. I have been there already. Thanks everyone for the biased and unhelpful responses.
You're welcome.
Quote from: LittleWhiteMan on May 24, 2018, 08:22:15 AM They are not short anymore. At least the youth. I have been there already. Thanks everyone for the biased and unhelpful responses.
You've been to Guatemala?
You are arguing against facts... Your height neurosis just makes you notice the taller ones from their younger generations more. They are still factually the shortest women, on average, on Earth... This is not up for discussion. As you've seen in my quotes, they've grew, but are still the shortest.
Quote from: myloginacct on May 24, 2018, 07:14:48 PMYou've been to Guatemala?
You are arguing against facts... Your height neurosis just makes you notice the taller ones from their younger generations more. They are still factually the shortest women, on average, on Earth... This is not up for discussion. As you've seen in my quotes, they've grew, but are still the shortest.
Women but not men lol. Men are all around 5’6 there now, definitely shorter than us Mexicans but not by a lot.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
