At least his leg-to-body ratio look normal with clothes, IDK how he looks nked post 9 cm femoral lengthening.
His tibia looks really bad (due to botched 1st LL) and needs correction.
And, 169 is not midget height, he was 163 before tibia LL so if we consider his starting height of 163, then I agree, he was really short for a grown male.
Regarding final height post double LL, I think that 175 is decent for really short guys and there's nothing wrong with being average in stature.
KiloKAHN was exactly the same in height, build and proportions as me before his LL. I too have very wide frame, big torso, normal arms for my natural height (not short and not long either) and proportionally short legs. This build makes me look even shorter than I am and after 6 cm tibia LL my proportions will get much better I believe. KiloKAHN looks great at 170 but he would benefit from femur LL of 6-7 cm in terms of better height and proportions. IMO I too will need femur LL post tibia LL but I might never do that or if I get tons of money and spare time, I will do it with PRECICE MAX only.
Strong 170 with decent frame, physique and longish tibia is enough to feel as a normal sized man and I understand that being at least 175 is preferred but that's unfortunately not an option for me and Kilo unless we blow huge money with PRECICE MAX in the future. That's why guys 175 and above who want to lose 1 year of their life with LL are insane IMO. Unless they want to correct bowlegs or obvious disproportion between limbs, I see no reason getting LL and losing tons of money and 1 year of life at that height.
This is what double LL of 15 cm looks like on a 163 cm original body
Quote from: limby101 on May 30, 2024, 05:13:53 PMI think he looks perfectly normal.
No one in real life stares at a persons figure in this scrutinized way.
Well said. He looks normal and for sure way better than a perfectly proportioned 1.65 or 1.70 guy. Also I've seen many real height 1.78 men having worse proportions, at least aesthetically.
I don't know how ruined are the biomechanics of this man after 15cm but in terms of looks he is normal.
The guy looks ok, much better than before !
There is no "T-rex" arms there.
However, is clearly a bowleg on the left shin. Its like a deformity.
Hopefully he is healthy... this is the most important thing.
He can't be healthy with such a severely bent tibia until he fixes that.
He did LON femurs with Buldu for 9 cm. Most of you guys say that LON femurs is crippling, especially more than 8 cm. It seems that he got better results with it compared with his first LL of 6 cm tibia with unknown fixators which caused severe bowleg on one of his leg.
Yes, you are right he looks weird and i guess that when nked like at the beach it's really obvious that something isn't right with his legs. I have the same height as him pre op, 163cm with a 165cm wingspan, after seeing this i'm more commited to do a max of 7 cm in the femurs and call it a day, it's better to be a little shorter at 170 than to look like a freak for the rest of the life. I never wanted to be tall anyway, what matters the most for me it's to look more normal in comparison with others men, so height isn't my defining characteristic
Rellec:
IMO, anyone can spot that he's disproportional and there's no question about it. He did 15 cm at a 163 cm starting height with tiny torso and arms and it's impossible for him to look normal after that.
Of course if he tries to wear any kind of swimsuit he will look really odd. It's not only about arm length but his torso length is very small too. It's impossible for him to look normal besides men who are in a 175-180 range.
Looking like a freak is a legit concern after double LL of huge amounts.
6 inches is too much IMO. 4.5 inches or 11.5 cm in total is the upper limit. The more I see the results of massive lengthenings, the more I'm getting sure about it.
You must be logged in to post a reply.