We all know the best decision for femurs are internal(less painful,kinda faster recovery) and by making small amounts like 5-6, young age also should help ,but what about tibias ,and i just can't imagine myself 1 years outside from my life at my best age
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Jul 28, 2017, 12:14 pm
#1
Posted on Jul 28, 2017, 12:17 pm
#2
The fastest way is internal femurs, especially with the obsolete weight bearing nails Guichet and Betz use.
But faster is not the best. LL is not a game, if you don't have enought time then don't do it.
Posted on Jul 28, 2017, 1:38 pm
#3
Doing 5cms with a nail like the Precice 2 with a competent surgeon is the best way. Great proportions, fast recovery. If I didn't need the height that bad, I would've done 5-6cms too. The reason people don't do this is because they either need the height real bad, or after spending this much, want that 3rd inch. If you can suppress that desire it should help you tons.
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago