Ok - We all know that Stryde is off the option table for now due to the Nuvasive field notice and voluntarily recall. I’ve been following along like many and have watched every interview I can find by the best known NA surgeons, all 4 of which have explained that corrosion is normal and has happened for a long time with most if not all implants and that they would have no concerns about using Stryde on their family members - at least that is what I heard. My question: is anyone here really thinking that there is some real and larger systemic problem with Stryde such that they would not do Stryde without some major reengineer? I for one would have no problem doing it tomorrow without any changes and think the whole thing is overblown....but I am biased since I want to get CLL before the pandemic is all over and my cover story disappears. Thoughts?
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
Who here is really concerned about Stryde’s safety?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Mar 25, 2021, 2:45 am
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago