Question, if you had to choose would you rather have an extra 6 cm in your femurs or 5 cm in your tibias PLUS 50,000$ cash. I’ll explain my situation further down.
Honestly, it’s the old internal vs external question. My choices would be Dr. Guichet or Dr. Pili. I know internals with Guichet would probably be more comfortable with a much faster recovery time, but I know I can safely get 5 cm with Dr. Pili. (more than likely I would try for 5.5 cm in tibias or 6.5 cm in femurs, either way only 1 cm difference and both safe). Substitute Paley for Guichet for those of you that prefer but either way same question applies.
My situation is as such: I just got a job that will let me save/make decent money. I plan on saving for about 1.5 years (maybe a little more) and I can probably save around 90k (enough for internals). Even if make enough for LL before the 1.5 years I need to stay in this job for this long or a bit longer for career purposes. So I'll have the money either way.
It will be ungodly hours and the work is very hard physically and mentally. The reason I’m thinking so much is that I understand that internals recovery “better/easier” but the thought of all that money and work being spent and me coming home flat broke and have to start all over again for just 1 extra centimeter makes me think. But I also understand that this surgery will affect me for the rest of my life so what's an extra year of work in the long term? (if I wanted to do internals and actually have some money left over, so 2.5 years of saving/working)
Idk I think it's because I’m now 26 and I will be like 27-28 when I do LL (28-29 if I chose internals and want some money left over) . I am also 162 cm and I want to get this LL thing over with so I can move on with my life. I know I’ll still be short, but it will be a big difference. I don’t have a problem being short, I just want to move on from LL. (on a side note, its really not as depressing as a lot of you make it seem)
What do you all think? I’m leaning towards going to Dr. Pili after 1.5 years and have some money left over and getting this over with asap. I can always wear an extra sole in my shoe if I’m really dying for that 1cm boost.
P.S on a side note 5.5 on tibias and 6.5 on femurs would be my absolute max for recovery purposes.
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
Would you rather have 6 cm extra height or 5 cm extra PLUS 50,000 cash?
Posted on Aug 26, 2017, 4:17 pm
#1
Posted on Aug 26, 2017, 6:45 pm
#2
Quote from: FDR101 on August 26, 2017, 05:34:09 PMI would do internals on femurs, but stick to 5 cm.
In general tibia is more complicated and I wouldn't recommend more than 4 cm. Especially if you are 162 cm.
Your femurs are naturally longer than your tibias.
Even at 162 I think most people will agree that one could safety lengthen 5 cm with good PT, lots of standing/walking if allowed and lengthening at a slow rate. Yes the soft tissue isn't as elastic as femurs but it has been safely done many many times. I get the recovery wont be as swift or seamless but that's the trade off I guess
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Ultimate Guide to Precice Stryde
CuriousPatient
2 replies • 8 hours ago
An australian guy grew 6 inches at 26 years old while in a 3 months coma
sxxa
55 replies • 3 days ago
VIOLENCE in yonsei kim & chung orthopedic clinic
shi
240 replies • 4 days ago
Fitbone nail sound once it reaches its maximum length?
KevinnLord
2 replies • 6 days ago
PlANNING TO DO ANOTHER SURGERY IN VIETNAM IN 2026 ANYONE WANTS TO JOIN ME?
NorthBarista
17 replies • 1 week ago