171-181 cm & Good Looking vs. 181-191 cm & Below Average Looking

Edit Post

Quote from: Alu on January 28, 2016, 01:48:49 AMIn my honest opinion, from that comment about "breaking a bone is not so bad" in context of a cosmetic procedure, I find you crazy for not taking the time to realize how crazy this is.

And again, this is coming from a guy who is now fully confident in LL.

You see this as crazy, I dont... I see ripping your skin appart in order to change your face, breasts, ass, injecting a dangerous toxin (bottulin) as much if not worse. Bone heals... Skin on the other hand never completely heal. You are making of this a bigger deal than what it is... That's all. I say this again because I am almost a doctor and have spoken to orthopedics who are as "big" as paley or guichet. So please, calm down

Edit Post

Quote from: aspirant185 on January 28, 2016, 01:54:49 AMYou guys went too far off-topic but I would say that facial handomness is much mroe important than height, provided a certain minimum height of around 167-8 is achieved. Now, at that point, if one is really handsome, the is a huge pool of women around 160-165, of course if one is so handsome and also has a grat body, girls that are 168-171 are also not out of his reach.

Of course it is very rare to find people that are extremely short and extremely gorgeous or very tall and totally ugly, most people fall inbetween. Nevertheless, I am absolutely certain that LL cannot do anything for peole with no dating/sex life before the procedure. It could without a doubt increase the potential of guys who were doing good - moderately good , but the ones who have barely slept with girls for which they did not pay it would have very little value.

100% agree with you

Edit Post

Quote from: Alu on January 28, 2016, 01:28:44 AMLastly, don't neglect the fact that this isn't a mental problem, cause it is.

I agree with you on this one because, to 99.999999999% of the population, LL is fkng crazy!!!!!   

In order to decide to do this surgery, we must be at a point where our backs are put up against a wall to the point that we are willing to voluntarily do the unimaginable;  Break our own Legs!

I thought of this clip when I think of how the general public must view LL 




Most people would rather die before doing what James Franco did to save his life.  That is why all of us who are willing to do the unimaginable procedure of LL, have to be absolutely crazy, or possess the most resilient survival instinct that we choose LIFE at any cost, instead of suffering a slow hopeless and painful death.     

Edit Post

Quote from: ouroboros on January 28, 2016, 05:34:50 AMI agree with you on this one because, to 99.999999999% of the population, LL is fkng crazy!!!!!   

In order to decide to do this surgery, we must be at a point where our backs are put up against a wall to the point that we are willing to voluntarily do the unimaginable;  Break our own Legs!

I thought of this clip when I think of how the general public must view LL 



That was fked up.
Most people would rather die before doing what James Franco did to save his life.  That is why all of us who are willing to do the unimaginable procedure of LL, have to be absolutely crazy, or possess the most resilient survival instinct that we choose LIFE at any cost, instead of suffering a slow hopeless and painful death.   

Edit Post

Quote from: TIBIKE200 on January 27, 2016, 11:30:42 PMFrom personal experience (Since I can't speak for the ladies).
  Good looks with being 171cm (my height.. Well since Yoga it became 172 for now) is much better than being tall and ugly.
  From what I have witnessed in my 25 years on this earth, the rules go like this; facial aesthetics=height>muscular body. Passing the "looks" test will get you to the character test. No matter how good you did in the "looks" test, if you fail at the "character" test you lose. In order to be attractive enough for a relationship you need to have both the looks and the character... Fail at one and you failed the exam.
  Height is part of looks. A decent looking guy at 180 (5'10-11) may have better chances than a decent looking 172 (5'7) guy. It depends on the woman... And frankly, there doesnt exist on this earth two people who are equally handsome

Out if all the crap I have read on here about what women value in a man, I'd say this is right on the mark.

Edit Post

Quote from: Deads on January 28, 2016, 01:26:38 PMOut if all the crap I have read on here about what women value in a man, I'd say this is right on the mark.

 I said, from personal experience... There isnt a rule

Edit Post

Quote from: TIBIKE200 on January 28, 2016, 02:20:34 PM I said, from personal experience... There isnt a rule

I know

Edit Post

There is an equation for this... approximately...

Short 25pts
Tall 50 pts

Ugly 25pts
Handsome 50pts

Your personality may add up to 25 pts to this (yes if you are tall, handsome and good guy, you are over 100) You get it..

Edit Post

you can be handsome maybe better than t.cruise but this photo show everythink
http://squackle.com/tag/magic-mike/

Edit Post

Quote from: texasbruce on January 28, 2016, 05:39:09 PMThere is an equation for this... approximately...

Short 25pts
Tall 50 pts

Ugly 25pts
Handsome 50pts

Your personality may add up to 25 pts to this (yes if you are tall, handsome and good guy, you are over 100) You get it..

Depends... Personality affects the way you are percieved. For the first glance you might seem unattractive but if you have an attractive character, it will influence how good you look. Didnt it happen to you that a woman became much more good looking once you liked her character and vice-versa, a good looking woman became less appealing once she started to open her mouth? And let's not talk about love which transforms even the most average looking woman into miss universe in your eyes. Character has A MAJOR influence on the way people see you (in terms of how good looking you are). The only "problem" is that in order for this to happen, you need to have the chance to show your character.