Right so, I was thinking about how every cm has exponentially more risk. When you reach 6cm, things start to get a bit tricky. Virtually most of the problems that we see in diaries are from those who did 6cm+.
This made me think, there is a sweet spot where the chance of total recovery is possible. By total recovery, I mean that you are able to go back exactly like it was. As cyborg4life once said, your ceiling will be reduced; however, most people never reach their ceiling which means that you can even be better post-LL.
I was wondering how riskier 5cm is compared to 4cm. Any input from LL veterans would be appreciated. Feel free to speculate and enter a civil debate, it is great to hear everyone's opinions!
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Apr 8, 2022, 8:18 pm
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 4 weeks ago