Hi,
Most people in the forum wrote 7 cm (health) and 8 cm (max) for the femur.
If there is 8 cm, does the +1 cm difference have long-term health disadvantages?
Does it cause long-term trouble for 8 cm femur?
I couldn't decide 7 cm or 8 cm.
Thanks.
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on May 13, 2020, 8:48 pm
#1
Posted on May 19, 2020, 2:45 pm
#2
Quote from: Futureller on May 13, 2020, 09:15:47 PMCan't speak to health advantages, and im sure most of us can't because they wouldnt know the difference of the two since they didnt choose both 7cm or 8cm for femurs its one or the other, but from a typical ll point of view and mind set I would say as long as you listen to your body and permits it, go for the extra 1cm since it's almost half and inch and every extra bit of height helps most of us on this forum in our situation.
Thanks.
Yes, 1 cm is important.
But for 1 cm, nobody wants to live the rest of his life, like a cripple 
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 4 weeks ago