MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Nov 6, 2020, 1:13 pm
#1

What is more dangerous?

In the first case we are overlengthening, which is associated with higher rate of complications

In the second case, we are smashing the bones in our legs but we are lengthening only to the "safe" limits

Like (0)
Posted on Nov 6, 2020, 1:58 pm
#2

Correct me if I am wrong but the diaries you mention are quadrilateral lengthenings

I was thinking of 5cm tibias in 1 year, and then the next year 6 cm femur

But if 8cm femur is safer I d probably go for this, since it is cheaper and cuts recovery time ideally in half

Like (0)
Posted on Nov 10, 2020, 12:14 pm
#3

Quote from: Highest on November 09, 2020, 08:12:33 PMWhen you say 8cm femur is overlengthening what do you mean?


Some doctors, like Janet Conway say it is better to stop at 5cm. So then 8cm would be overlengthening (not a medical term, I made it up)

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics