Quote from: yogobro298 on February 24, 2018, 05:59:58 AMHonestly though being shredded isn't all that IMO.
That's precisely what I was saying. Having a "shredded" body is hardly even impressive anymore. If you're in the U.S., the number of young men going to the gym and getting "ripped" is higher than it's ever been, and the number is only going to go up over time. Being shredded may have been noteworthy in 1970, but in 2018, Tinder, Tumblr, Snapchat, and all other forms of social media are absolutely overflowing with guys showing off their physiques. It's basically a dime-a-dozen thing nowadays.
Even if it weren't, being "shredded" doesn't create sexual market value/raw physical attraction where it wouldn't otherwise exist. A 5'9"+ guy who's shredded is a shredded guy. A 5'5" guy who's shredded is a short guy. To the overwhelming majority of women, 10% bodyfat with visible abs on a short guy is about as appealing as rotten, moldy cake with a dash of whipped cream on top.
Quote from: Body Builder on February 20, 2018, 11:02:29 PMI don't think he looks good. He looks shorter than 5.5.
Lee Priest who is 5.45 looks way better and taller than him.
he have an horrible body, he looks about 155cm
Quote from: Knik on February 24, 2018, 09:59:12 AMhe have an horrible body, he looks about 155cm
The older I get the more, I start to think having all that muscle doesn't look good on smaller frames.They have obviously put in hard work,but its not that appealing imo. I would rather have a runners physique.
Quote from: yogobro298 on February 24, 2018, 01:23:20 PMThe older I get the more, I start to think having all that muscle doesn't look good on smaller frames.They have obviously put in hard work,but its not that appealing imo. I would rather have a runners physique.
when you have short arms it's ugly
In general all these physiques are built with steroids which allows you to build far far more muscle than you can naturally. It’s not appealing to women and the vast majority of people are aware the bodies are steroid built. The physiques attained steroid free look better in general to women. Certain muscles in particular on steroids get hugely inflated which makes you look cartoonish like the delts, traps and thighs. The funny thing about vast majority of these guys as well is half can’t even properly squat 225 and struggle to curl 35lb dumbells
Quote from: extremis on February 24, 2018, 06:24:38 AMThat's precisely what I was saying. Having a "shredded" body is hardly even impressive anymore. If you're in the U.S., the number of young men going to the gym and getting "ripped" is higher than it's ever been, and the number is only going to go up over time. Being shredded may have been noteworthy in 1970, but in 2018, Tinder, Tumblr, Snapchat, and all other forms of social media are absolutely overflowing with guys showing off their physiques. It's basically a dime-a-dozen thing nowadays.
Even if it weren't, being "shredded" doesn't create sxxual market value/raw physical attraction where it wouldn't otherwise exist. A 5'9"+ guy who's shredded is a shredded guy. A 5'5" guy who's shredded is a short guy. To the overwhelming majority of women, 10% bodyfat with visible abs on a short guy is about as appealing as rotten, moldy cake with a dash of whipped cream on top.
Yea you sound like you're a shredded beefcake with the body of a greek god
Quote from: yogobro298 on February 22, 2018, 11:41:58 PMlol
He seems to be the right amount of shredded.
https://www.instagram.com/jeffnippard/
It's better than looking like this:
But this is too much for non body builders:
Quote from: myloginacct on February 24, 2018, 05:50:10 PMHe seems to be the right amount of shredded.
https://www.instagram.com/jeffnippard/
It's better than looking like this:
But this is too much for non body builders:
You're posting pictures of these people,but looks are subjective its just a small piece of the pie.
Money,and status play a role too. Some women would choose Daniel Rad over Jeff just because of his money and status like I said its all subjective.
Quote from: yogobro298 on February 24, 2018, 06:15:26 PMYou're posting pictures of these people,but looks are subjective its just a small piece of the pie.
Money,and status play a role too. Some women would choose Daniel Rad over Jeff just because of his money and status like I said its all subjective.
What do you need to have a gf :
- be taller than everybody
- be muscular and athletic
- be pretty -if you don't have blue or green eyes it's over-
- be a Hollywood actor
- have millions of dollars
- be optimistic, generous, romantic, virile, fashion, interesting, cultivated
Quote from: yogobro298 on February 24, 2018, 06:15:26 PMYou're posting pictures of these people,but looks are subjective its just a small piece of the pie.
Money,and status play a role too. Some women would choose Daniel Rad over Jeff just because of his money and status like I said its all subjective.
I was specifically talking about physical attractiveness in a 5'5 male. I think Jeff's look beats Priest's and Radcliffe's, in that sense. That's really all.
You must be logged in to post a reply.