I've always loved the idea of a relic hominid in the forests of the Pacific Northwest, but maybe that's just me. I like to say that I believe that there is, in fact, something to the Bigfoot legend. What about you guys?
Quote from: Hallijah on January 24, 2015, 06:33:23 AMLet's stop this this autism, ples
Wtf?
Quote from: Taller on January 24, 2015, 05:40:11 AMI am bigfoot, I confess. That is the real reason why I'm not happy with my height at 5'10 
Lol; i almost forgot that you had the patterson-gimlin picture as your avi.
Quote from: Puertoricanwasp123 on January 24, 2015, 06:31:55 AMI also believe in The Loch Ness Monster.
I haven't seen much credible evidence for nessie, but Bigfoot seems plausible.
Quote from: ForcedPuberty on January 24, 2015, 10:54:40 PMI don't have a dog in this fight 
. don't know anything about big foot, don't care to know anything about bigfoot.
however even things we know exist and have been captured have taken over half a century to find with hundreads of expert trackers trying to find them for their entire lives.
just saying anything is possible. who is looking for big foot. well certainly not hundreds of highly skilled trackers lol so if hes real its going to take longer than 60 years lol.
http://www.bigfootlunchclub.com/2009/11/panda-discovered-in-1927-was-once-as.html
And, with the vastness of the pacific northwestern forest and the lack of any concerted efforts to find him, it would be no surprise that this species of Sasquatches wouldn't have been found yet.
You must be logged in to post a reply.