Hi guys, I have decided to go to Dr Lee in Korea for CLL, it's just a matter of time. I think he has a reasonable price and he focuses on rehab. He has done a lot of Lon on Tibia as well and though the amount of patient he has had is great, I haven't heard any bad reviews.
I noticed in one of his videos, he noted Femur has more advantage in recovering athleticism, can somebody explain the reason behind this? Also, can people whos had CLL in tibia answer this question with experience?
Thanks
← Back to Limb Lengthening Discussions
Athleticism difference of CLL in Tibia and Femur
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Jun 7, 2020, 12:13 pm
#1
Posted on Jun 8, 2020, 12:12 am
#3
Femur has more muscle tissue and blood supply surrounding it. Assuming none of that is damaged, that gives it the advantage in terms of athleticism.
Posted on Jun 9, 2020, 2:31 am
#6
Quote from: staytall on June 08, 2020, 09:58:29 PMWhy the focus on femur lengthening though I know it’s preferable for good reasons when the tibia becomes shorter in relation to a lengthened femur. If you’re in shorts or in swimwear or just underwear, can’t people see your femur looks longer than your tibia?
Because you can lengthen more with femurs. Like a whole inch more
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago