I was wondering.. do all indicators work together to give an indication of whether someone looks normal? or has good proportion? ie, you can have a low wingspan versus height but if all other indicators are good, u might pass off as a natural tall guy? not the best in terms of proportion, but passable?
Also, I realise there is a huge range for many ratios. The only constant appears to be femur-tibia ratio, its always around 0.8 even for Asians(there was a Korean study). so... for most ratios which have a huge range, lets say you are Asian and you end up with a Black American ratio or a white American ratio, or an Australian aboriginal ratio... is it gonna look OK still, since we are all humans? I mean, if another ethnic group can have your ratio, it must be within the realm of human-ness right? and there is a good chance another guy in your ethnic group would have a similar ratio.......
How you look isn't that scientific, watch yourself in a mirror and/or ask some of your friends what they think?
I think its like big ears.
no one is going to say its not normal.
but they sure as hell are going to laugh at you bag you out and call you dumbo the elephant.
long legs will get you called grasshopper. lol
Long legs are actually a sign of a healthy, attractive adult. It might look weird if they're too long, but if you lengthen a reasonable amount I wouldn't worry about it.
Quote from: ForcedPuberty on February 27, 2015, 09:54:37 PMI think its like big ears.
no one is going to say its not normal.
but they sure as hell are going to laugh at you bag you out and call you dumbo the elephant.
long legs will get you called grasshopper. lol
That's it
You must be logged in to post a reply.