MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Oct 28, 2020, 6:14 pm
#1
As much as I dream of doing 8cm on femurs with Stryde, nothing guarantees I'll save 50k+, so I am keeping a plan B of just doing 5 to 6cm on tibias with TSF.

The thing is, I think I already have longer tibias than femurs or so it looks to me. Any LL veteran who had the same situation and nevertheless did tibias, did you end up looking very bad (not in clothes but nked)?

I am wondering because I have a friend who is 193 and most of his leg height is tibias, but I am not so sure artificial lengthening would work out equally well.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 28, 2020, 6:25 pm
#2
Femurs are naturally 20% longer than tibias.
It is impossible to have linger tibias than femurs. An x ray of your legs with measurements will prove you what I say.
Like (0)
Posted on Oct 28, 2020, 6:29 pm
#3
The apparent "tibia" is the tibia, ankle, and foot, which is often about equal to the femur.
Like (0)
Posted on Oct 28, 2020, 6:43 pm
#4
Quote from: Body Builder on October 28, 2020, 06:25:50 PMFemurs are naturally 20% longer than tibias.
It is impossible to have linger tibias than femurs. An x ray of your legs with measurements will prove you what I say.

I ll post a picture later, really hope you are right man it would be big relief to know I have this option as well.

Quote from: HobbesTheDog on October 28, 2020, 06:29:59 PMThe apparent "tibia" is the tibia, ankle, and foot, which is often about equal to the femur.

Didn't get this, so feet count in the length of tibia?
Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics