Hello everybody,
I'm in the last days of the first phase of my limb lenghtening project and next tuesday i'll get the second surgery to remove the fixators and lock the nails. I had the femurs lengthened.
Talking to the doctor he said i dont necessarily need the third surgery to remove the internal nails. So my plans t avoid a third procedure and spending more money was to try a normal life with the nails in my bones
The surgery and area are clean. My bones are recovering greatly after a 5cm and nearly 3 months from the first surgery. No big pains, infections, nothing. Just discomfort.
I wonder what are the problems of making this decision. Do I must remove it? (From a clinical/medical point of view of course) or is it safe to let it in? Why must someone remove the nails?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Oct 6, 2017, 3:03 am
#1
Posted on Oct 6, 2017, 4:18 am
#2
Not known in the community
But certainly a good doctor in my country. He actually has a clinic with 2 partners and they are probably the best intheir field over here
but i wanted to hear other opinions about that. Im a little bit confused with this and im a little afraid of him not being fair. But i still doubt very much
Anyway do you have an answer?
Posted on Oct 6, 2017, 2:40 pm
#3
hmm I'm understanding
I will think about it
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How about the German guy who did 18cm in livelifetaller now?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 week ago
Limb lengthening costs in London GP clinics versus private hospitals Which is cheaper
mason_f89
7 replies • 2 weeks ago
Limb lengthening surgery above 40: Is it still a viable option for height increase
sofia2000
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Stryde Nail 2024 Results: Is This the Future of Femur Lengthening Surgery
mike_t
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice Stryde nail vs traditional lengthening methods which is safer
victoria1991
7 replies • 3 weeks ago
Precice nail surgical technique: Does it outperform LON method for femur lengthening
owen_b
7 replies • 3 weeks ago