First, let me get something straight: I don't have a problem with getting women. I get plenty of causal sex through my work, but, outside of my work, I try to talk to women as little as possible (they simply aren't worth the time and money). Therefore, I'm unaware of how women judge height in regular social settings. My question is this: do women care how tall a man is if he is strong? For example, Ed Coan was only 5'6 (or maybe 5'5), but he could bench press about 585 lbs without a bench shirt and deadlift over 900 lbs raw (with no equipment). In short, he could kill any man, tall or short, with his bare hands. With a guy like that, are women really going to think "I'm not going to date that guy because I need a man to protect me" or "I need a real man to make me feel feminine". I know a lot of women are very stupid, but would most women think this way about short but strong men like Ed Coan?
Yes, btw they dont rate strength as much as u'd think
Dude you just called an most of them stupid yet you care about what they think? I think the best answer to your question is also the tiest which is that it varies. Most older women 30+ are more likely to want an all american type man like what you described instead of just a tall one with no muscle. It's also a matter of where they grew up and what they value southern girls will probably take a strong man over a tall one who's puny. But from what I've seen growing up in a big city height beats out strength almost always with city girls not counting looks obviously.
Looks really have nothing to do with height. Height is completely irrelevant to looks. I mean, it's not like height is going to influence your facial aesthetics.
Well, yeah, a lot of women are mind-blowingly stupid. I don't really care what they think; honestly, all that crap about getting a girlfriend or wife is way overrated.
Quote Height is completely irrelevant to looks. I mean, it's not like height is going to influence your facial aesthetics.
this statement is based on nothing.
it is already proven that taller people have longer legs and arms and overall height because of better nutrition.
how do you know that with better nutrition they don't have a propensity to have a better hormone profile on average compared to shorter people on average, and how do you know that people with better nutrition don't on average have better facial features.
your statement is based on absolutely nothing except emotions.
Quote from: ForcedPuberty on January 12, 2015, 08:08:37 AMthis statement is based on nothing.
it is already proven that taller people have longer legs and arms and overall height because of better nutrition.
how do you know that with better nutrition they don't have a propensity to have a better hormone profile on average compared to shorter people on average, and how do you know that people with better nutrition don't on average have better facial features.
your statement is based on absolutely nothing except emotions.
So the short brother who ate and did everything his 1 year older big brother did. And still got 5 inches shorter?.
Also tall guys have a set code dna that says they are gonna grow to this perticular height. Then their bodies starts to go ape with a special hgh chemical outburst and they grow to their dna number of Dna:0.292.
While you had Dna: 0.472 and ur body did not grow vigioursly
Is this real life kind of stupid.
Height <-> Strength, but strength is immeasurable. Whether it's mentally or physically, both height and muscle are merely representations of those strengths, but comes down in a matter of choice for that woman in particular.
In public settings, women would tend to do the same thing as you did - do their everyday lifestyle without making too much effort to go for men. If you put yourself out to a woman in that public setting, she will see you in that light regardless of looks, or she is just busy/uninterested (Unlikely)
In bars, that's when women's "Jungle mode" is engaged, and she will make the effort for the tallest/handsome guys subconsciously - but as long as you portray some social dominance, you wouldn't have much of a problem at all.
QuoteSo the short brother who ate and did everything his 1 year older big brother did. And still got 5 inches shorter?.
Is this real life kind of stupid.
I honestly have no idea what your even trying to say?
are you asking a question or making a statement with no proof?
QuoteSo the short brother who ate and did everything his 1 year older big brother did. And still got 5 inches shorter?.
I am assuming you are the short brother who got the crap genes from your parents. your genes are completely different from your brothers. don't think that because you are brothers your genetic profile is or has to be similar.
if you still need an explanation here is a short video describing what happened in the womb for you and your brother.
enjoy
No they don't care about strenght -at least not how much you can lift. Things like what car you drive, how much money you make, how big your penis is, how much you can lift, how good you are at fighting etc is mostly a male thing to impress other men. Women aren't very interested in that kind of dck-measuring contests.
Ask yourself: how much do you care what brand of perfume she is wearing, how fancy her dinner parties are, how fashionable her clothes, how "cute" her furniture is or indeed how tall she is? That doesn't mean much to you and by the way she probably thinks you're stupid for caring about strongmen/guns/cars/sports and she's most likely as frustrated with your prefference for large breasts, model-like looks, and large hip-waist ratio as you are with her prefference for taller men.
Why would you need a woman with large hips now that modern medicine makes giving birth practicly completely safe?
You must be logged in to post a reply.