MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Jan 16, 2024, 12:07 am
#1
In a recent interview (3 weeks ago) with cyborg4life, Paley said that in the year 2023 that he “hasn’t had a single fat embolism that year” (after some changes to his protocol). However, the CLL guidebook pdf emailed to me by Paley’s staff writes that their “incidence of symptomatic fat embolism requiring treatment is 5%”.

What is the truth of the matter?
Like (0)
Posted on Jan 16, 2024, 12:13 am
#2
To add to this, they frequently mention the rate of “some form of fat embolism” (allegedly usually not noticeable) is “around 4%”. So I’m just getting a load of different numbers
Like (0)
Posted on Jan 16, 2024, 5:34 am
#3
The conclusion of 4% or 5% is based on Paley's decades-long practice, but in 2023 he adopted new technology and protocols that reduced the occurrence probability of fat embolism to nearly zero.
Like (0)
Posted on Jan 16, 2024, 7:20 am
#4
Interesting. Can you elaborate more on what was changed in the protocols ? (If you know, by any chance) ?
Like (0)
Posted on Jan 16, 2024, 1:14 pm
#5
http://www.limblengtheningforum.com/index.php?topic=680.62 here is your answer. Drilling small holes before inserting nail.
Like (0)
Posted on Jan 19, 2024, 6:49 am
#6
Quote from: youyin12 on January 16, 2024, 05:34:51 AMThe conclusion of 4% or 5% is based on Paley's decades-long practice, but in 2023 he adopted new technology and protocols that reduced the occurrence probability of fat embolism to nearly zero.
And has that claim been verified by a third party/is the data publicly available, or do we just have to take Paley's word on it?
Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics