Hello.
I am struggling if I should do tibia or femur lengthing.
I am 177cm tall. My femur to tibia ratio is 81.3%
Femur: 46cm
Tibia 37,6cm
wingspan 178cm
I would like to do only 5 cm as I think more is to risky and will destroy my proportions.
I wanted to go for femur as it is faster consolidating and less risky.
I have created mockups:
Original
http://image-upload.de/image/3fFIRq/940232ac5e.jpg
Femur 5cm
http://image-upload.de/image/goJV65/d597fddb3d.jpg
Tibia 5cm
http://image-upload.de/image/ruxdIa/3b8a4d879b.jpg
What do you guys think?
Why do you think my tibias are short? As far as I have googled .8 is the avarage femur/tibia ratio. Thus my tibia are little shorter than my femurs.
I want to go with internal nails. Also I am afraid of the scars. Thus I tend to do internal femur with e.g Betz.
I read that tibia with internal nails is risky and thus they recommend external methods with tibia. But there I will get lots of scars and have the risk of infections right?
Next problem I have is that I can only stay 6 monts away from my job.
I appreciate your input!
What are you suggesting?
Money is no problem for me.
With externals I am scared about risk and scars.
Femur I am little worried about proportions.
So you would also go for femur?
It seems he has average 0.8 ratio.
I still would like to know if 0.73 ratio will be visible to others. I don't want anybody to know my lentghing.
I am afraid to be unhappier than before bc of unproportions
I am still unsure what to do. Is there someone with 0.73 ratio or less. Does it look freaky? Do you think I can walk after 4 months without noticing that I did surgery?
I would go for 4-5 cm. It would be better with internal I think.
So you would go for internal femur?
How long does it take to recover with 5cm?
What would be the right choice. IT is so hard to decide.
You must be logged in to post a reply.