A common idea here is that early puberty = shorter height. It's typical to see in men, I know a lot of kids who were 5'4-5'5 and prepubescent, high-voice, etc until sophomore year in high school and they all grew to be over 6ft, meanwhile the kids who matured in 8th grade were done growing by the time high school started.
People stop growing once puberty hits apparently because estrogen slowly causes the growth plates to fuse. This is a common reason to explain why women are shorter than men, their higher levels of estrogen and earlier maturation causes them to stop growing earlier and for them to be shorter.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Acceleration1.jpg
Yet female height has increased over the past 200 years while the age female's have their first period has decreased significantly. Just look at Germany, they reach puberty a whole 2.5 years earlier.
If you cut off any boys puberty and growing time by 2.5 years, he would be significantly shorter, I mean 3 inches shorter. Yet, this trend in earlier menarche has had absolutely no effect on final female height.
Is puberty time, duration, hormones, etc... really not as important to final height as doctors think?
← Back to Off Topic
If women are hitting puberty significantly earlier, why are they still taller?
Related Medical Evidence Peer-Reviewed
Posted on Mar 5, 2018, 4:23 am
#1
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
Separation of nail bed a common issue after limb lengthening surgery
jen_w94
7 replies • 1 month ago
What Factors Delay Height Increase Surgery Recovery Time the Most
david_h94
7 replies • 1 month ago
Stryde nail limb lengthening: Are 7cm gains possible with newest distraction techniques
james_t92
6 replies • 1 month ago
Limb lengthening before and after pictures: Do 5cm gains require internal nail removal
anthony2002
4 replies • 1 month ago
Anyone tried round kicking?
Minkowski
2 replies • 1 month ago
Femur Lengthening Surgery Costs: Is 8000 Dollars a Realistic Price in the US
oscar_b92
7 replies • 1 month ago