In my position, how much would you lengthen?

Edit Post

169 => 177 cm to be near 5'10" with just femurs and call it a day - seems like the best option which would definitely alleviate my neurosis and make me a respectable height
or
169 => 179 cm with quads - I would do this if I was closer to 176 than 177 in the previous option because I don't wanna be 5'9"
or
169 => 182 cm to be 6'0" with 13 cm quads - very tempting option - athleticism ?, screwed proportions with my already longish legs?, will be eligible to exist on Tinder (lol) and be solid tall where I live
or
169 => 174-175 cm to be almost 5'9" just to be safe - still a respectable height and retain athleticism but maybe won't make me VERY happy

Edit Post

Quote from: HobbesTheDog on October 14, 2020, 07:05:14 AMDo femurs first, then if you're not satisfied do tibias a year later.

yeah, the best approach. Just want to know what others would prefer to do in this scenario

Edit Post

Quote from: Body Builder on October 14, 2020, 10:08:38 PMI would just do tibias and gain 6-7 cm and thats it.
Like I did.
If I had much money maybe I would have done another 6cm in femurs if I really wanted it but I would definitely begin with tibias.

Why would you recommend tibias over femurs if they have harder recovery and can handle less length comparatively? The cost?

Edit Post

Quote from: BelowTheMean on October 15, 2020, 03:16:13 PM169 to 177 since that's what I'm doing

Looking forward to your diary! My journey is still pretty far away

Edit Post

Quote from: ZUCC420 on October 14, 2020, 08:34:12 PMSix feet and call it a day simply because of me being an idealist.

Once I assess my proportions with finality with x-rays and if miraculously my proportions can support it I'll just see how it goes I guess