MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on May 6, 2023, 9:49 am
#1
Hello!

This question has been popping up before for sure, but that was years ago. So I ask it again - how safe is doing 8cms on femurs using LON? What are some serious disadvantages/complications associated with LON that could have been easily avoided by using externals or Stryde? Is LON weight-bearing, btw?
Like (0)
Posted on May 6, 2023, 9:58 am
#2
downside is scarring and pin site infections being more difficult to treat than tibias. both because there is more tissue to stretch and manage. consolidation and recovery phase is somewhat longer.

price is around half of iln and it is weightbearing. some consider cosmetic lon femur to be malpractice with the associated risks but it's doable
Like (0)
Posted on May 6, 2023, 10:57 am
#3
Quote from: junior006 on May 06, 2023, 09:58:01 AM
downside is scarring and pin site infections being more difficult to treat than tibias. both because there is more tissue to stretch and manage. consolidation and recovery phase is somewhat longer.

price is around half of iln and it is weightbearing. some consider cosmetic lon femur to be malpractice with the associated risks but it's doable

How severe are those scars and can they be removed afterwards?
What about infections? Are the risks really worse than, say, the risks associated with purely external femoral lengthening?
Like (0)
Posted on May 6, 2023, 1:21 pm
#4
you can find images online of lon femur scars. it depends on your skin tone and fat distribution, someone with pale skin and chubby legs will probably get very obvious scars. for the average person they fade over time but will likely remain somewhat visible. in comparison precice scars is practically invisible a year into recovery. lon is better than fully external for both femur and tibia. but even lon there's just so much thigh flesh stretching and contacting metal many would consider it torture. sleeping position is limited, if you're a side sleeper the external fixation can make sleeping incredibly difficult; i think this is an important point that isn't brought up as much.

if you can afford it don't cheap out just go ILN. for your sanity
Like (0)
Posted on May 6, 2023, 4:06 pm
#5
Quote from: junior006 on May 06, 2023, 01:21:48 PM
you can find images online of lon femur scars. it depends on your skin tone and fat distribution, someone with pale skin and chubby legs will probably get very obvious scars. for the average person they fade over time but will likely remain somewhat visible. in comparison precice scars is practically invisible a year into recovery. lon is better than fully external for both femur and tibia. but even lon there's just so much thigh flesh stretching and contacting metal many would consider it torture. sleeping position is limited, if you're a side sleeper the external fixation can make sleeping incredibly difficult; i think this is an important point that isn't brought up as much.

if you can afford it don't cheap out just go ILN. for your sanity

Unfortunately, I can't afford Stryde or Precice, and won't be able to finance it even in a remote future (unless a very generous donation is made, lol). So either LON or full Ilizarov is my only way.
Like (0)
Posted on May 7, 2023, 4:24 pm
#6
It's quite painful, but it's manageable. I've done it, countless others have done it.

But yeah you'll end up with scars, they can make them less v8sible after you're done.
Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics

LON surgery in August - 2x2.5cm in both legs
Nomad34 30 replies • 2 minutes ago
LON for less than 20k €
Thehighest 0 replies • 4 minutes ago
Verteporfin: Scarless healing
MakeMeTallAF 0 replies • 4 minutes ago
Gym in extension period
Ozzi6557 0 replies • 4 minutes ago
Flying on a Plane with Precise 2.2 Non-weight-bearing nails
LU213 0 replies • 4 minutes ago