He is actually the first to report a nuissence proportionally speaking. And he did 8cm which means that proportionally it is 8cm+6.4cm (tibias and respecting the femurs tibia ratio)+1-2cm torso. If he were proportional for his height, he should have been 181-182 now.
So this is why it is strange for him
Quote from: TIBIKE200 on June 24, 2016, 08:09:24 PMHe is actually the first to report a nuissence proportionally speaking. And he did 8cm which means that proportionally it is 8cm+6.4cm (tibias and respecting the femurs tibia ratio)+1-2cm torso. If he were proportional for his height, he should have been 181-182 now.
So this is why it is strange for him
It's one of those things you don't really think about pre LL.
I imagine things like the toilet bowl being further away while peeing, the car pedals being closer, etc.
But the mechanics of sex never really occured to me
Ive been with 155cm girls and 173cm girls. Of course with each height it's different... But it just means that now he fks like a 5'11-6'. I guess it just needs time to get used to... That's all
Quote from: TIBIKE200 on June 24, 2016, 08:22:20 PMIve been with 155cm girls and 173cm girls. Of course with each height it's different... But it just means that now he fks like a 5'11-6'. I guess it just needs time to get used to... That's all
You hear that difm? You just need more practice!
So get after it man! Lol
Short girls are more manageable in bed. I don't like tall girls They look manly to me.
Quote from: LLuser1 on June 24, 2016, 10:18:38 PMShort girls are more manageable in bed. I don't like tall girls They look manly to me.
Well I guess tall girls look down at us as feminine 
Quote from: CCMidwest on June 24, 2016, 08:24:15 PMYou hear that difm? You just need more practice!
So get after it man! Lol
Alright, here's an update on this situation. More practice is definitely what was needed. The mistakes I made before was that I tried doing the same angles and positions that I was used to, but the mechanics of sex are slightly different now. So the difference between pre-LL and post-LL (for femurs) are like this:
1) Doggy style is much easier now. Now that my femurs are much longer than the girl's, I can enter from a higher angle and hit the G spot easier. This was not possible when I had shorter femurs.
2) I can't fold my legs during missionary position anymore unless the girl is on a ramp or pillows. So with longer femurs and less flexibility, it's harder for me to fold and split my legs to get to a low angle. Before LL, I was able to do it. Now the girl has to be on a ramp for me to do it. And if we don't use props, then I have to straighten my legs to get low enough.
3) For a while, I couldn't do the pronebone position. Pronebone was the position I had to do when I had shorter femurs, because my femurs weren't long enough to do doggy style effectively. Now the opposite happened and pronebone is harder to do because my femurs are longer and I can't get in a lower angle even if I straightened my legs. That's because the pronebone position required you to bend your legs further back than just 180 degrees. Now that my flexibility has improved, I'm able to do pronebone again without getting soft from the pain from being overstretched.
After relearning how to have great sex again, sex is great again. I'm able to avoid putting my legs in weird positions, and therefore avoid feeling pain in my legs during sex. Without the awkwardness and pain, I don't get soft again, and my sex drive is back to what it was before LL.
For some reason that reminds me of when I lost my virginity...
Anyway,
Good job difm!
Quote from: axelf on June 24, 2016, 02:43:43 PMAnymore insights about the hair loss thing?
I've heard there is a correlation between hair loss and anesthesia.
I went under a few years ago and noticed my hair looked rather thin afterwards, but eventually it seemed to fill back in (maybe it was all in my head).
You must be logged in to post a reply.
