QuoteCan you explain why Mahboubian would have been a good choice (apart from being local to you) based on your research?
I am not going to cheerlead for any particular surgeon. I researched many surgeons the world-over and conclude that only a handful of top-level leg lengthening surgeons exist. I am not going to set out a list of names because reasonable minds can disagree about who should be on the list.
What criteria did I consider to characterize a surgeon as top-level?
In general, that the surgeon performs leg lengthening regularly (or exclusively); that is, that leg lengthening is a primary focus of the surgeon's practice. That the surgeon also conducts research regarding leg lengthening and is published (books or peer-reviewed articles). That the surgeon performs both medically necessary and elective leg lengthening. That the surgeon has no public record of discipline or gross malpractice and is regulated by a professional body. That the surgeon employs a team of qualified professionals. That the surgeon practices in a first world country with modern facilities.
Though at the time Mahoubian was still a bit new to the game for my liking, Mahoubian ticked all of these boxes as did several other surgeons.
I ultimately decided as I did because, all other things being relatively equal, I could not come close to the value offered by the Solomin/Kulesh team. But every potential patient must do his or her own analysis and draw his or her own conclusions.
Though I wrote that I was not going to cheerlead, I will add that I was concerned I would get to Russia and be disappointed. The opposite happened. Facilities were new and modern and I have never experienced such a high degree of medical expertise, thoughtfulness, and attention.
This is NOT to say that others may not be equally impressed by services offered in other first world countries--but I cannot speak to matters I did not experience.