MEDICAL DISCLAIMER: The information provided on OrthoLength Pro is for educational purposes only and does not substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified orthopedic surgeon.
Posted on Oct 14, 2016, 12:22 am
#1

I think I hit a nerve. This guy has issues.

So I asked him to stop PM'ing me but he kept going on so why not share with you some stuff? He looks mad  Mr. Sarcastic

https://postimg.org/image/3s2nbxg7n/

He asked me to google it since I cba to "argue with stupidity" I followed his advice. I simply clicked a random link and it seems it gives me reason:

https://postimg.org/image/mv4co9qyt/

So yeah, w/e Mr. Dumb.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 14, 2016, 12:28 am
#2

Quote from: YourSpaceBoyfriend on October 14, 2016, 12:27:30 AMRather than making more fuss just contact moderator.


Nah, I don't mind it, just wanted to share. Though you're kinda right, we have enough off topics going on.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 14, 2016, 12:33 am
#3

Quote from: YourSpaceBoyfriend on October 14, 2016, 12:31:15 AMFor what? To create more drama?

Because besides it that topic serves no purpose.

chill cowboy, I said you were right.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 14, 2016, 12:59 am
#4

Quote from: LLuser1 on October 14, 2016, 12:50:54 AMMr Sarcastic is right here. If you make up stories it could be a crime but if those stories are real there is no defamation, and I got my information from real people who told me the truth. Sometimes I misinterpret but I always apologize if I'm wrong. I have 2 examples of confusions:

1) I said there was a Monegal patient whose implant failed and had to be exfixed and had to pay again and finally got a new implant. I understood this patient was the American guy but it was Musicmaker. Musicmaker got everything in this lottery. The American guy had also problems with implants but he didn't have to be exfixed. I got confused and then apologized.

2) I said there was a patient who died in the guesthouse and MM had a complication again. Was it false? No. No defamation then. It's true there was a guy in the guesthouse who died from a femur fracture and that Musicmaker had a new complication. When people said the guy who died was not a Monegal patient I accepted that because I don't know more details than that but I cannot accept new lies about Musicmaker because I know she is having complications and went to hospital because people from the guesthouse confirmed this.

Those are the 2 cases where I got confused. The rest of the information I have posted here is right. No defamation then. You have no case.

Mr. Sarcastic is right about what? We weren't even talking about you or Monegal lol. Just defamation in general.

Oh btw, I think this is interesting and you're right, if it's true what you said there is no defamation.

The three most important things to remember about defamation law in the United States:

1) In order to win a case, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant made a purposeful or negligent false statement of fact;

2)Harm is an essential component of slander and libel law. If you can't prove that the statements under review caused material harm, it is very difficult to win a defamation claim.

3)The statute of limitations for defamation is short. As such, don't wait to take action -- you may just miss your window.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 14, 2016, 1:12 am
#5

Quote from: Mr. Sarcastic on October 14, 2016, 12:55:53 AMHahahahahaha! "When the ignorant have dug themselves into a hole, they will just keep digging"

I really feel sorry for your parents. They must have tried their best, but sometimes there is nothing anyone can do to help people like you.

Here's a hint Einstein, are you ready? Key in on the phrasing, you know, your choice of words. I think I was generous when I said 3-4 lifetimes. You may need double that....

Lmfao, I'm 100% sure about  the way I phrased it so why don't you challenge me with some proof? Either that or crawl back to the hole you came from.

Like (0)
Posted on Oct 14, 2016, 11:23 am
#6

Quote from: The Kaiser on October 14, 2016, 10:08:37 AMIts always a bad thing to expose a private message with someone i believe its called "private" for a reason. only in some exception cases. anyways this law will not make any crap. he's just trolling


Did you even read what the private message was all about? It was 2 setences full of insults. And we never had a private conversation, it was him sending me PM's which I warned him to stop. And for the record, I never associated the law with his trolling so make some sense please.

But then again you're that guy that found his posts funny so nvm.

Like (0)

You must be logged in to post a reply.

Related Topics