So im interested in a leg lengthening but im unsure how my proportions will look after. Should i go for the femur or tibia based on these pictures?
My height is 163cm and my armspan is 170cm(bad or good?)
http://imgur.com/PS8d1DB
http://imgur.com/dLSThm9
Posted on Jul 28, 2017, 11:10 am
#1
Posted on Jul 28, 2017, 5:13 pm
#2
Quote from: Body Builder on July 28, 2017, 12:24:36 PMYou have a little longer tibias than usual compared to femurs.
So doing femurs is the best for you
I was thinking the same. How much is possible to gain through LL? im 163cm so reaching around 175cm would require the tibia to be lengthened as well i suppose?
Posted on Jul 29, 2017, 12:38 am
#3
173 sounds great, everything close to 170cm would be a game changer in my life i believe.
Posted on Aug 1, 2017, 12:19 pm
#4
Here is how i would look like with lengthened femurs and tibias. I dont know exactly how long i am in this picture but i think its around 175.
EDIT: had wrong pic before, here is the correct:
http://imgur.com/kNCN08Q
Looks normal?
You must be logged in to post a reply.
Related Topics
How much lengthening can I do before looking disproportionate ?
Goofy
3 replies • 11 minutes ago
Head circumference to height ratio
NotTallEnough
1 replies • 11 minutes ago
someone needs to stop tremba
account03
17 replies • 11 minutes ago
Proportions after limb lengthining
Achieverr
6 replies • 11 minutes ago
Severe Proportions Neurosis Post LL
GC Quad
16 replies • 2 weeks ago