Quote from: Smallguy on April 22, 2014, 12:20:47 AMTrue. And eventually if you work in business or have a white collar job, you will need to wear dress shirt and tuck your shirt inside your pants. There is no room to hide anything there. And it is counter-intuitive to have to hide something after LL and after all the money you have paid. Yeah
180cm is a perfect height for me. Most women I ask prefer this height and no taller. The first reason is most girls are in the 5'4 to 5'8 range. Dating someone over 6'1 would make them look dwarf. So I believe the height advantage after 5'11 to 6'0 is very minimal or none. And from my experience, most tall girls don't really care about height... it's just the same as when you ask black guy about penis size. It's probably something they already have and are not concern about.
I agree with what you said about 180cm. I think people really do overestimate how tall people are and how tall is 'good'. I was sitting in the car yesterday and realised if my sitting height was 5cm taller and my legs were say 7cm longer, I'd have real trouble being comfortable in the car. All the best sportsmen at my college were around 6' - not any higher really. Yeah you got the 6'4" guy built like a skyscraper who was good at rugby, but 90% of people were faster and more agile than him. Out of 60 boys in my year, the tallest was 'only' 6'3". The most attractive guy was 5'10", and not a single girl held that against him. Would they have liked him better at 6'1"? I'm sceptical. I never liked the narrative on the other site that "bigger ALWAYS means better".
First of all, girls over exaggerate height. I challenge anyone here to be able to differentiate between a 6'4" guy and a 6'6" guy when close up. Now imagine scaling that down. How many women can really tell the difference between 6' and 6'1"? or 6'1" and 6'3" for that matter?
